ABSTRACT
The identification of complex periodic windows in the two-dimensional parameter space of certain dynamical systems has recently attracted considerable interest. While for discrete systems, a discrimination between periodic and chaotic windows can be easily made based on the maximum Lyapunov exponent of the system, this remains a challenging task for continuous systems, especially if only short time series are available (e.g., in case of experimental data). In this work, we demonstrate that nonlinear measures based on recurrence plots obtained from such trajectories provide a practicable alternative for numerically detecting shrimps. Traditional diagonal line-based measures of recurrence quantification analysis as well as measures from complex network theory are shown to allow an excellent classification of periodic and chaotic behavior in parameter space. Using the well-studied Rössler system as a benchmark example, we find that the average path length and the clustering coefficient of the resulting recurrence networks are particularly powerful discriminatory statistics for the identification of complex periodic windows.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work has been financially supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) (Project No. He 2789/8-2), the Max Planck Society, the Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) via the Potsdam Research Cluster for Georisk Analysis, Environmental Change and Sustainability (PROGRESS), and the Leibniz association (project ECONS). All complex network measures have been calculated using the software package IGRAPH.66 We thank K. Kramer for help with the IBM iDataPlex Cluster at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, on which all calculations were performed.
- 1. J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 1990). Google Scholar
- 2. Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Analysis, 3rd ed. (Springer, New York, 2004). Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. J. A. C. Gallas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2714 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2714, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. J. A. C. Gallas, Physica A 202, 196 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(94)90174-0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. C. Bonatto, J. Garreau, and J. A. C. Gallas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 143905 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.143905, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. Y. Zou, M. Thiel, M. Romano, Q. Bi, and J. Kurths, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 16, 3567 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127406016987, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. E. Barreto, B. Hunt, C. Grebogi, and J. Yorke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4561 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4561, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. E. N. Lorenz, Physica D 237, 1689 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2007.11.014, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. L. C. Martins and J. A. C. Gallas, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 18, 1705 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127408021294, Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. R. Perez and L. Glass, Phys. Lett. A 90, 441 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(82)90391-7, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. J. Belair and L. Glass, Phys. Lett. A 96, 113 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(83)90481-4, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. P. Gaspard, R. Kapral, and G. Nicolis, J. Stat. Phys. 35, 697 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01010829, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. J. Bélair and L. Glass, Physica D 16, 143 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(85)90055-7, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. M. S. Baptista, Ph.D. thesis, University of São Paulo, 1996. Google Scholar
- 15. M. Thiel, Ph.D. thesis, University of Potsdam, 2004. Google Scholar
- 16. C. Bonatto and J. A. C. Gallas, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 366, 505 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2107, Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. J. A. C. Gallas, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 20, 197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127410025636, Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. L. Glass, Nature (London) 410, 277 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35065745, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. C. Bonatto and J. A. C. Gallas, Phys. Rev. E 75, 055204 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.055204, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. C. Bonatto and J. A. C. Gallas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 054101 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.054101, Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. V. Kovanis, A. Gavrielides, and J. A. C. Gallas, Eur. Phys. J. D 58, 181 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2010-00061-4, Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. C. Bonatto, J. A. C. Gallas, and Y. Ueda, Phys. Rev. E 77, 026217 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.026217, Google ScholarCrossref
- 23. H. A. Albuquerque, R. M. Rubinger, and P. C. Rech, Phys. Lett. A 372, 4793 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.05.036, Google ScholarCrossref
- 24. H. A. Albuquerque and P. C. Rech, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 19, 1351 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127409023676, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. J. C. D. Cardoso, H. A. Albuquerque, and R. M. Rubinger, Phys. Lett. A 373, 2050 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.024, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. E. R. Viana, R. M. Rubinger, H. A. Albuquerque, A. G. Oliveira, and G. M. Ribeiro, Chaos 20, 023110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3407482, Google ScholarScitation
- 27. J. G. Freire, R. J. Field, and J. A. C. Gallas, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 044105 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3168400, Google ScholarScitation
- 28. S. L. T. de Souza, I. L. Caldas, and R. L. Viana, Math. Probl. Eng. 2009, 290356 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/934524, Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. M. S. Baptista, M. B. Reyes, J. C. Sartorelli, C. Grebogi, and E. Jr. Rosa, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 13, 2551 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127403008077, Google ScholarCrossref
- 30. D. M. Maranhão, M. S. Baptista, J. C. Sartorelli, and I. L. Caldas, Phys. Rev. E 77, 037202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.037202, Google ScholarCrossref
- 31. R. Stoop, P. Benner, and Y. Uwate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 074102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.074102, Google ScholarCrossref
- 32. H. Kantz and T. Schreiber, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004). Google Scholar
- 33. J. -P. Eckmann, S. Kamphorst, and D. Ruelle, Europhys. Lett. 4, 973 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/4/9/004, Google ScholarCrossref
- 34. N. Marwan, M. Romano, M. Thiel, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rep. 438, 237 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.11.001, Google ScholarCrossref
- 35. M. Thiel, M. Romano, P. Read, and J. Kurths, Chaos 14, 234 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1667633, Google ScholarScitation
- 36. N. Marwan, J. F. Donges, Y. Zou, R. V. Donner, and J. Kurths, Phys. Lett. A 373, 4246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.09.042, Google ScholarCrossref
- 37. J. Zhang and M. Small, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 238701 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.238701, Google ScholarCrossref
- 38. X. Xu, J. Zhang, and M. Small, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 19601 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0806082105, Google ScholarCrossref
- 39. R. V. Donner, Y. Zou, J. F. Donges, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, New J. Phys. 12, 033025 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033025, Google ScholarCrossref
- 40. R. V. Donner, M. Small, J. F. Donges, N. Marwan, Y. Zou, R. Xiang, and J. Kurths, “Recurrence-based time series analysis by means of complex network methods,” Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. (in press). Google Scholar
- 41. J. Zbilut and C. Webber, Phys. Lett. A 171, 199 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)90426-M, Google ScholarCrossref
- 42. L. Trulla, A. Giuliani, J. Zbilut, and C. Webber, Phys. Lett. A 223, 255 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00741-4, Google ScholarCrossref
- 43. N. Marwan, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 164, 3 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2008-00829-1, Google ScholarCrossref
- 44. C. Webber, N. Marwan, A. Facchini, and A. Giuliani, Phys. Lett. A 373, 3753 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.08.052, Google ScholarCrossref
- 45. Y. Zou, D. Pazó, M. Romano, M. Thiel, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 76, 016210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.016210, Google ScholarCrossref
- 46. E. Ngamga, A. Nandi, R. Ramaswamy, M. Romano, M. Thiel, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 75, 036222 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.036222, Google ScholarCrossref
- 47. E. Ngamga, A. Buscarino, M. Frasca, L. Fortuna, A. Prasad, and J. Kurths, Chaos 18, 013128 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2897312, Google ScholarScitation
- 48. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/30918, Google ScholarCrossref
- 49. D. Lathrop and E. Kostelich, Phys. Rev. A 40, 4028 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.40.4028, Google ScholarCrossref
- 50. J. Dall and M. Christensen, Phys. Rev. E 66, 016121 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.016121, Google ScholarCrossref
- 51. Y. Zou, M. Thiel, M. C. Romano, and J. Kurths, Chaos 17, 043101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2785159, Google ScholarScitation
- 52. E. Ott, Chaos in Dynamical Systems, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002). Google ScholarCrossref
- 53. R. V. Donner, Y. Zou, J. F. Donges, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 81, 015101(R) (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.015101, Google ScholarCrossref
- 54. P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 346 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.346, Google ScholarCrossref
- 55. S. Schinkel, O. Dimigen, and N. Marwan, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 164, 45 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2008-00833-5, Google ScholarCrossref
- 56. N. Asghari, C. Broeg, L. Carone, R. Casas-Miranda, J. C. C. Palacio, I. Csillik, R. Dvorak, F. Freistetter, G. Hadjivantsides, H. Hussmann, A. Khramova, M. Khristoforova, I. Khromova, I. Kitiashivilli, S. Kozlowski, T. Laakso, T. Laczkowski, D. Lytvinenko, O. Miloni, R. Morishima, A. Moro-Martin, V. Paksyutov, A. Pal, V. Patidar, B. Pecnik, O. Peles, J. Pyo, T. Quinn, A. Rodriguez, C. Romano, E. Saikia, J. Stadel, M. Thiel, N. Todorovic, D. Veras, E. Vieira Neto, J. Vilagi, W. von Bloh, R. Zechner, and E. Zhuchkova, Astron. Astrophys. 426, 353 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20040390, Google ScholarCrossref
- 57. F. James, Statistical Methods in Experimental Physics, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006). Google ScholarCrossref
- 58. D. C. Montgomery, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 7th ed. (Wiley, New York, 2009). Google Scholar
- 59. R. G. Lomax, Statistical Concepts: A Second Course for Education and the Behavioral Sciences (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2007). Google Scholar
- 60. B. Welch, Biometrika 34, 28 (1947). Google Scholar
- 61. W. J. Conover, Practical Nonparametric Statistics (Wiley, New York, 1999). Google Scholar
- 62. M. Hollander and D. A. Wolfe, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1999). Google Scholar
- 63. T. Fawcett, Pattern Recogn. Lett. 27, 861 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010, Google ScholarCrossref
- 64. M. Hénon, Physica D 5, 412 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(82)90034-3, Google ScholarCrossref
- 65. N. Marwan, e-print arXiv:1007.2215v1. Google Scholar
- 66. G. Csárdi and T. Nepusz, InterJournal CX.18, 1695 (2006). Google Scholar
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

