No Access Submitted: 15 August 1989 Accepted: 18 October 1989 Published Online: 17 August 1998
Journal of Applied Physics 67, 1736 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.345622
more...View Contributors
  • C. J. Bedell
  • C. J. Sofield
  • L. B. Bridwell
  • I. M. Brown
Amorphous poly‐ether‐ether‐ketone (PEEK) films have been implanted with a variety of ions (He, N, F, As, Xe and I) in the energy range 50 keV to 32 MeV. At the lower end of this range, the dependence of the electrical conductivity of the PEEK on the dose and ion species has been explained in terms of a simple model of electronic and nuclear excitation effects. Implantations in the MeV energy range yielded a surface layer on the PEEK with a high conductivity [up to 2.5 (Ω cm)1] and a moderate hardness (320 knoop, 1‐g load). Evidence for diffusion of iodine implanted at the highest energy has been found. The role of the uniform iodine concentration throughout the implanted layer in the prevalent conduction mechanism is not known at present.
  1. 1. M. L. Kaplan, S. R. Forrest, P. H. Schmidt, and T. Venkatesan, J. Appl. Phys. 55, 732 (1984). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  2. 2. T. Venkatesan, S. R. Forrest, M. L. Kaplan, P. H. Schmidt, C. A. Murray, W. L. Brown, B. J. Wilkens, R. F. Roberts, L. Rupp, Jr., and H. Schonhorn, J. Appl. Phys. 56, 2778 (1984). Google ScholarScitation
  3. 3. M. S. Dresselhaus, B. Wasserman, and G. E. Wnek, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 27, 413 (1984). Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. T. Venkatesan, R. C. Dynes, B. Wilkens, A. E. White, J. M. Gibson, and R. Hamm, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 27, 449 (1984). Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. S. A. Jenekhe and S. J. Tibbetts, J. Polym. Sci. B 26, 201 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. I. H. Loh, R. W. Oliver, and P. Sioshansi, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 34, 337 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. B. Wasserman, Phys. Rev. B 34, 1926 (1986). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  8. 8. A. J. Dann, M. R. Fahy, C. Jeynes, and M. R. Willis, J. Phys. D 19, L217 (1986). Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. K. Yoshida and M. Iwaki, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 19/20, 878 (1987). Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. J. Davenas, X. L. Xu, M. Maitrot, C. Mathis, andB. Francois, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 32, 166 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. H. Mazurek, D. R. Day, E. W. Maby, J. S. Abel, S. D. Senturia, and M. S. Dresselhaus, J. Polym. Sci. 21, 537 (1983). Google Scholar
  12. 12. J. L. Duroux and A. Moliton, Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 34, 450 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. A. B. Wittkower and H. D. Betz, At. Data 5, 113 (1973). Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. J. P. Biersack and L. G. Haggmark, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 174, 257 (1980). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  15. 15. J. F. Ziegler, J. P. Biersack, and U. Littmark, The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids (Pergamon, Oxford, 1985). Google Scholar
  16. 16. G. Carter and J. S. Colligon, Ion Bombardment of Solids (Heinemann, London, 1968). Google Scholar
  17. 17. J. Mort and G. Pfister, Electronic Properties of Polymers (Wiley, New York, 1982). Google Scholar
  1. © 1990 American Institute of Physics.