No Access Submitted: 18 February 2008 Accepted: 26 October 2009 Published Online: 30 November 2009
Physics of Fluids 21, 115109 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266945
more...View Affiliations
View Contributors
  • Claudio Viotti
  • Maurizio Quadrio
  • Paolo Luchini
Steady forcing at the wall of a channel flow is studied via direct numerical simulation to assess its ability of yielding reductions in turbulent friction drag. The wall forcing consists of a stationary distribution of spanwise velocity that alternates in the streamwise direction. The idea behind the forcing builds on the existing technique of the spanwise wall oscillation and exploits the convective nature of the flow to achieve an unsteady interaction with turbulence. The analysis takes advantage of the equivalent laminar flow, which is solved analytically to show that the energetic cost of the forcing is unaffected by turbulence. In a turbulent flow, the alternate forcing is found to behave similarly to the oscillating wall; in particular an optimal wavelength is found which yields a maximal reduction in turbulent drag. The energetic performance is significantly improved, with more than 50% of maximum friction saving at large intensities of the forcing, and a net energetic saving of 23% for smaller intensities. Such a steady, wall-based forcing may pave the way to passively interacting with the turbulent flow to achieve drag reduction through a suitable distribution of roughness, designed to excite a selected streamwise wavelength.
C.V. has been supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research through the Grant No. PRIN 2005 on Large scale structures in wall turbulence. We acknowledge interesting discussions with Dr P. Ricco. Part of this work has been presented by C.V. in June 2007 at the XI European Turbulence Conference, Porto (P).
  1. 1. M. Gad-el Hak, Flow Control: Passive, Active and Reactive Flow Management (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. P. Bradshaw and N. S. Pontikos, “Measurements in the turbulent boundary layer on an ‘infinite' swept wing,” J. Fluid Mech. 159, 105 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112085003123, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. G. E. Karniadakis and K. -S. Choi, “Mechanisms on transverse motions in turbulent wall flows,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 35, 45 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.35.101101.161213, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  4. 4. W. J. Jung, N. Mangiavacchi, and R. Akhavan, “Suppression of turbulence in wall-bounded flows by high-frequency spanwise oscillations,” Phys. Fluids A 4, 1605 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858381, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  5. 5. M. Quadrio and S. Sibilla, “Numerical simulation of turbulent flow in a pipe oscillating around its axis,” J. Fluid Mech. 424, 217 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112000001889, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. J. -I. Choi, C. -X. Xu, and H. J. Sung, “Drag reduction by spanwise wall oscillation in wall-bounded turbulent flows,” AIAA J. 40, 842 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.1750, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. M. Quadrio and P. A. Ricco, “Initial response of a turbulent channel flow to spanwise oscillation of the walls,” J. Turbul. 4, 7 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/1468-5248/4/1/007, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. M. Quadrio and P. Ricco, “Critical assessment of turbulent drag reduction through spanwise wall oscillation,” J. Fluid Mech. 521, 251 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112004001855, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. F. Laadhari, L. Skandaji, and R. Morel, “Turbulence reduction in a boundary layer by a local spanwise oscillating surface,” Phys. Fluids 6, 3218 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868052, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. K. -S. Choi and M. Graham, “Drag reduction of turbulent pipe flows by circular-wall oscillation,” Phys. Fluids 10, 7 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869538, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  11. 11. K. -S. Choi, “Near-wall structure of turbulent boundary layer with spanwise-wall oscillation,” Phys. Fluids 14, 2530 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1477922, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  12. 12. A. Baron and M. Quadrio, “Turbulent drag reduction by spanwise wall oscillations,” Appl. Sci. Res. 55, 311 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00856638, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. H. Schlichting and K. Gersten, Boundary-Layer Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. J. Kim and F. Hussain, “Propagation velocity of perturbations in turbulent channel flow,” Phys. Fluids A 5, 695 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.858653, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  15. 15. T. W. Berger, J. Kim, C. Lee, and J. Lim, “Turbulent boundary layer control utilizing the Lorentz force,” Phys. Fluids 12, 631 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.870270, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  16. 16. H. Zhao, J. -Z. Wu, and J. -S. Luo, “Turbulent drag reduction by traveling wave of flexible wall,” Fluid Dyn. Res. 34, 175 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluiddyn.2003.11.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. W. Schoppa and F. Hussain, “A large-scale control strategy for drag reduction in turbulent boundary layers,” Phys. Fluids 10, 1049 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869789, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  18. 18. W. Schoppa and F. Hussain, “Coherent structure generation in near-wall turbulence,” J. Fluid Mech. 453, 57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002211200100667X, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  19. 19. J. Jeong, F. Hussain, W. Schoppa, and J. Kim, “Coherent structures near the wall in a turbulent channel flow,” J. Fluid Mech. 332, 185 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  20. 20. C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (Springer, Berlin, 1999). Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. P. Ricco and M. Quadrio, “Wall-oscillation conditions for drag reduction in turbulent channel flow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 29, 601 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.12.005, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. P. Luchini and M. Quadrio, “A low-cost parallel implementation of direct numerical simulation of wall turbulence,” J. Comput. Phys. 211, 551 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2005.06.003, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  23. 23. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. M. Quadrio, C. Viotti, and P. Luchini, in Advances in Turbulence XI, edited by J. M. L. M. Palma and A. Silva Lopes (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 659–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72604-3_210, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. J. Jeong and F. Hussain, “On the identification of a vortex,” J. Fluid Mech. 285, 69 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112095000462, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  26. 26. K. -S. Choi, “Near-wall structure of a turbulent boundary layer with riblets,” J. Fluid Mech. 208, 417 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112089002892, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. H. Choi, P. Moin, and J. Kim, “Active turbulence control for drag reduction in wall-bounded flows,” J. Fluid Mech. 262, 75 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112094000431, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  28. 28. J. Jiménez, “Turbulent flows over rough walls,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 173 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.36.050802.122103, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  29. 29. D. W. Bechert, M. Bruse, W. Hage, J. G. T. van der Hoeven, and G. Hoppe, “Experiments on drag-reducing surfaces and their optimization with an adjustable geometry,” J. Fluid Mech. 338, 59 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096004673, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. M. Quadrio and P. Luchini, “Method for reducing the friction between a fluid and an object,” Patent WO/2009/000703, 2008. Google Scholar
  31. 31. Y. Peet, Y. Sagaut, and P. Charron, “Turbulent drag reduction using sinusoidal riblets with triangular cross-section,” AIAA Paper No. 2008–3745, 2008. Google Scholar
  1. © 2009 American Institute of Physics.