ABSTRACT
In this study, we present theoretical and experimental results regarding highly conductive modulation doped composition graded -AlGaN/(AlN)/GaN multiheterostructures. Based on simulation results, several multiheterostructures were grown by metalorganic vapor phase epitaxy. Using high resolution x-ray diffraction and x-ray reflectometry, the abruptness of the AlGaN/AlN/GaN interfaces could be determined. Using electron holography, the energetic profile of the valence band could be measured, yielding important information about the vertical carrier transport in such multiheterostructures. The electrical properties of the samples were investigated by measuring the lateral and vertical conductivity, respectively. The free hole concentration of a sample optimized in terms of lateral conductivity was measured to be (295 K) with a mobility of , yielding a record of . Low temperature Hall measurements (77 K) proved the existence of a two-dimensional hole gas at the AlN/GaN interface, as the lateral conductivity could be increased to and no carrier freeze out was observable. By substituting the -GaN layer in a light emitting diode (LED) with an AlGaN/GaN multiheterostructure, the overall voltage drop could be reduced by more than 100 mV . Furthermore improved current spreading on the -side of LEDs with integrated AlGaN/AlN/GaN multiheterostructures could be proved by -electroluminescence, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Research at Ulm University was financially supported by Osram Opto Semiconductors and the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF). The sample characterization by K. Forghani, A. Grob, H. Kaim, S. Galichin, and L. Kirste et al. (SIMS) is gratefully acknowledged. Research at Arizona State University was partially supported by Nichia Corporation and by a grant from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency DARPA-Visible InGaN Injection Lasers VIGIL program (No. FA8718-08-C-0002) under the management of Dr. Henryk Temkin.
- 1. P. Kozodoy, H. Xing, S. P. DenBaars, U. K. Mishra, A. Saxler, R. Perrin, S. Elhamri, and W. C. Mitchel, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 1832 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.372098, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 2. E. F. Schubert, W. Grieshaber, and I. D. Goepfert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 3737 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.117206, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 3. L. Hsu and W. Walukiewicz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 2405 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123897, Google ScholarScitation
- 4. P. Kozodoy, Y. P. Smorchkova, M. Hansen, H. Xing, S. P. DenBaars, U. K. Mishra, A. W. Saxler, R. β. Perrin, and W. C. Mitchel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2444 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.125042, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 5. K. Kumakura, T. Makimoto, and N. Kobayashi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 39, 2428 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.39.2428, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. A. Y. Polyakov, N. B. Smirnov, A. V. Govorkov, A. V. Osinsky, P. E. Norris, S. J. Pearton, J. Van Hove, A. M. Wowchack, and P. P. Chow, J. Appl. Phys. 90, 4032 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1405819, Google ScholarScitation
- 7. O. Ambacher, J. Smart, J. R. Shealy, N. G. Weimann, K. Chu, M. Murphy, W. J. Schaff, L. F. Eastman, R. Dimitrov, L. Wittmer, M. Stutzmann, W. Rieger, and J. Hilsenbeck, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3222 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.369664, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 8. M. Grundmann, University of California, Santa Barbara, (http://my.ece.ucsb.edu/mgrundmann/bandeng.htm). Google Scholar
- 9. S. Heikman, S. Keller, D. S. Green, S. P. DenBaars, and U. K. Mishra, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 5321 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1610244, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 10. M. Z. Kauser, A. Osinsky, A. M. Dabiran, and P. P. Chow, Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 5275 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1828230, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 11. J. Hertkorn, P. Brückner, C. Gao, F. Scholz, A. Chuvilin, U. Kaiser, U. Wurstbauer, and W. Wegscheider, Phys. Status Solidi C 5, 1950 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssc.200778514, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. B. Kuhn and F. Scholz, Phys. Status Solidi A 188, 629 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200112)188:2<629::AID-PSSA629>3.0.CO;2-# Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. J. Hertkorn, P. Brückner, S. B. Thapa, T. Wunderer, F. Scholz, M. Feneberg, K. Thonke, R. Sauer, M. Beer, and J. Zweck, J. Cryst. Growth 308, 30 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.07.056, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. J. Bläsing, A. Krost, J. Hertkorn, F. Scholz, L. Kirste, A. Chuvilin, and U. Kaiser, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 033504 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3074095, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 15. J. -H. Kim, S. C. Choi, K. S. Kim, G. M. Yang, C. -H. Hong, K. Y. Lim, and H. J. Lee, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 38, 2721 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.38.2721, Google ScholarCrossref
- 16. Z. H. Wu, F. A. Ponce, J. Hertkorn, and F. Scholz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 142121 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2795794, Google ScholarScitation
- 17. P. Kruse, M. Schowalter, D. Lamoen, A. Rosenauer, and D. Gerthsen, Ultramicroscopy 106, 105 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultramic.2005.06.057, Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. E. L. Waldron, J. W. Graff, and E. F. Schubert, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 2737 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1410340, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 19. Y. C. Shen, J. J. Wierer, M. R. Krames, M. J. Ludowise, M. S. Misra, F. Ahmed, A. Y. Kim, G. O. Mueller, J. C. Bhat, S. A. Stockman, and P. S. Martin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2221 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1566098, Google ScholarScitation
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

