No Access Submitted: 22 August 2008 Accepted: 15 October 2008 Published Online: 11 November 2008
Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 115103 (2008); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3013788
more...View Affiliations
View Contributors
  • I-Ming Chou
  • William A. Bassett
  • Alan J. Anderson
  • Robert A. Mayanovic
  • Linbo Shang
Metal gaskets (Re, Ir, Inconel, or stainless steel) normally used to contain fluid samples in the hydrothermal diamond-anvil cell (HDAC) are sometimes undesirable due to possible contamination and to gasket deformation at high pressures and temperatures resulting in nonisochoric behavior. Furthermore, in x-ray spectroscopic experiments, metal gaskets may attenuate the incident x-ray beam and emitted fluorescence x-rays, and the interaction of scattered radiation with the gasket may produce fluorescence that interferes with the x-ray spectrum of the sample. New arrangements and procedures were tested for the operation of the HDAC without using the metal gaskets. Distilled, de-ionized water was loaded into the sample chamber, a laser-milled recess 300μm in diameter and 50μm deep centered in the 1.0 mm face of the lower diamond anvil, and sealed by pressing the top diamond anvil face directly against the lower one without a metal gasket in between. A maximum sample pressure of 202 MPa at 617°C was maintained for a duration of 10 min without evidence of leakage. A small change in fluid density was observed in one experiment where the sample was held at 266 MPa at 708°C for 10 min. The gasketless HDAC was also employed in x-ray absorption spectroscopy experiments, where, in addition to the sample chamber in the lower diamond, two grooves were milled at a 90° angle to each other around the sample chamber to minimize the attenuation of incident and fluorescent x rays. With a minimum distance between the sample chamber and the grooves of 80μm, a pressure of 76 MPa at 500°C was maintained for 2 h with no change in the original fluid density.
I.-M. Chou would like to acknowledge the support of Energy and Mineral Programs of U.S. Geological Survey. L.B. Shang would like to thank the support of the China Scholarship Council and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 40503007) for her one-year visit to USGS. This work was also supported by a NSERC discovery grant to A.J.A. PNC/XOR facilities at the Advanced Photon Source, and research at these facilities are supported by the U.S. Department of Energy-Basic Energy Sciences, a major facilities access grant from the NSERC, the University of Washington, Simon Fraser University, and the Advanced Photon Source. We would also like to thank Robert Seal and Harvey Belkin of USGS and an anonymous reviewer for constructive reviews. Use of the Advanced Photon Source is also supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. The use of trade, product, industry, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government.
  1. 1. A. Audétat and H. Keppler, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2005.01.028 232, 393 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. I.-M. Chou and A. J. Anderson (unpublished). Google Scholar
  3. 3. A. H. Shen, W. A. Bassett, and I. -M. Chou, Am. Mineral. 78, 694 (1993). Google Scholar
  4. 4. H. Bureau and H. Keppler, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(98)00266-0 165, 187 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. W. A. Bassett, A. H. Shen, M. Bucknum, and I. -M. Chou, Rev. Sci. Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1143931 64, 2340 (1993). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  6. 6. R. A. Mayanovic, A. J. Anderson, W. A. Bassett, and I.-M. Chou, Rev. Sci. Instrum. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2737748 78, 053904 (2007). Google ScholarScitation
  7. 7. A. Saul and W. Wagner, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 18, 1537 (1989). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. R. O. Rye, Chem. Geol. 215, 5 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2008 American Institute of Physics.