thin films were grown using a rf-cracked Se-radical beam source. A unique combination of film properties, a highly dense and smooth surface with large grain size, is shown. These features seem to have no significant influence on the photovoltaic performance. Defect control in bulk CIGS leading to corresponding variations in the electrical and photoluminescence properties was found to be possible by regulating the Se-radical source parameters. A competitive energy conversion efficiency of 17.5%, comparable to that of a Se-evaporative source grown CIGS device, has been demonstrated from a solar cell fabricated using a Se-radical source grown CIGS absorber.
This work was supported in part by the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO).
- 1. J. E. Jaffe and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.29.1882 29, 1882 (1984). Google Scholar,
- 2. P. D. Paulson, R. W. Birkmire, and W. N. Shafarman, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1581345 94, 879 (2003). Google Scholar,
- 3. R. R. Gay, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 47, 19 (1997). Google Scholar,
- 4. M. A. Contreras, K. Ramanathan, J. AbuShama, F. Hasoon, D. L. Young, B. Egaas, and R. Noufi, Prog. Photovoltaics https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.626 13, 209 (2005). Google Scholar,
- 5. A. N. Nesmeyanov, Vapor Pressure of the Chemical Elements, edited by R. Gary (Elsevier, Amsterdam/London/NewYork, 1963), p. 327. Google Scholar
- 6. D. A. Cammack, K. Shahzad, and T. Marshall, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.102680 56, 845 (1990). Google Scholar,
- 7. G. Herzberg, The Spectra and Structures of Simple Free Radicals: An Introduction to Molecular Spectroscopy (Cornell University Press, New York, 1971), p. 2. Google Scholar
- 8. T. Hariu, S. Yamauchi, S. F. Fang, T. Ohshima, and T. Hamada, J. Cryst. Growth 136, 157 (1994). Google Scholar,
- 9. S. Ishizuka, K. Sakurai, A. Yamada, K. Matsubara, P. Fons, K. Iwata, S. Nakamura, Y. Kimura, T. Baba, H. Nakanishi, T. Kojima, and S. Niki, Proceedings of the 19th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Paris (WIP, Munich, 2004), p. 1729. Google Scholar
- 10. http://www.oaresearch.co.uk/QC200%20500.htm. Google Scholar
- 11. L. C. Calhoun and R. M. Park, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.369477 85, 490 (1999). Google Scholar,
- 12. M. A. Contreras, J. Tuttle, A. Gabor, A. Tennant, K. Ramanathan, S. Asher, A. Franz, J. Keane, L. Wang, and R. Noufi, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 41/42, 231 (1996). Google Scholar,
- 13. S. Ishizuka, K. Sakurai, A. Yamada, K. Matsubara, H. Shibata, M. Yonemura, S. Nakamura, H. Nakanishi, T. Kojima, and S. Niki, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE Fourth World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Hawaii (IEEE, New York, 2006), p. 338. Google Scholar
- 14. S.-H. Wei, S. B. Zhang, and A. Zunger, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.121548 72, 3199 (1998). Google Scholar,
- 15. S. B. Zhang, S.-H. Wei, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.9642 57, 9642 (1998). Google Scholar,
- 16. J. I. Pankove and J. A. Hutchby, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.322566 47, 5387 (1976). Google Scholar,
- 17. M. E. Lin, B. N. Sverdlov, and H. Morkoç, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.354285 74, 5038 (1993). Google Scholar,
- 18. R. Scheer, I. Luck, M. Kanis, M. Matsui, T. Watanabe, and T. Yamamoto, Thin Solid Films 392, 1 (2001). Google Scholar,
- 19. R. J. Molnar and T. D. Moustakas, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.357293 76, 4587 (1994). Google Scholar,
- 20. M. N. Ruberto and A. Rothwarf, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338377 61, 4662 (1987). Google Scholar,
- © 2007 American Institute of Physics.
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.