No Access Submitted: 04 November 2005 Accepted: 08 March 2006 Published Online: 12 May 2006
Journal of Applied Physics 99, 094308 (2006); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2194112
more...View Affiliations
View Contributors
  • Joshua M. Green
  • Lifeng Dong
  • Timothy Gutu
  • Jun Jiao
  • John F. Conley Jr.
  • Yoshi Ono
Multiwalled carbon nanotubes (CNTs) were coated, using atomic layer deposition, with a thin layer of ZnO and subsequently annealed. Studies of the morphologies of the ZnO-coated CNTs revealed no significant change in the internal structures (multiwalled graphite sheets) and the diameters of the CNTs, but the ZnO appeared to form bead-shaped single crystalline particles attaching to the surface of the nanotubes. The electron field-emission properties of the ZnO-coated CNTs were dramatically improved over both uncoated CNTs and ZnO nanowires. It is reasoned that numerous ZnO “nanobeads” on the surface of the nanotubes serve as additional emission sites, in addition to the tips of CNTs, and result in the enhancement of electron field emission.
  1. 1. S. Iijima, Nature (London) https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a0 354, 56 (1991). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  2. 2. W. A. de Heer, A. Châtelain, and D. Ugarte, Science https://doi.org/10.1038/354056a010.1038/363603a0 270, 1179 (1995). Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. A. G. Rinzler et al., Science 269, 1550 (1995). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  4. 4. W. B. Choi et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.125253 75, 3129 (1999). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  5. 5. N. Jonge, Y. Lamy, K. Schoots, and T. H. Oosterkamp, Nature (London) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01233 420, 393 (2002). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  6. 6. J. Jiao, L. F. Dong, D. W. Tuggle, C. L. Mosher, S. Foxley, and J. Tawdekar, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 706, 113 (2002). Google Scholar
  7. 7. W. Zhu, C. Bower, O. Zhou, G. Kochanski, and S. Jin, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.124541 75, 873 (1999). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. J. M. Bonard, J. P. Salvetat, T. Stöckli, L. Forró, and A. Châtelain, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003390050998 69, 245 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  9. 9. M. Svenningsson, R. E. Morjan, O. A. Nerushev, Y. Sato, J. Bäckström, and E. E. B. Campbell, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1498493 81, 1095 (2002). Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. M. Huang et al., Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1060367 292, 1897 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  11. 11. L. F. Dong, J. Jiao, D. W. Tuggle, J. M. Petty, S. A. Elliff, and M. Coulter, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1554477 82, 1096 (2003). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  12. 12. L. F. Dong, J. Jiao, C. Pan, and D. W. Tuggle, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-003-2295-1 78, 9 (2004). Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. D. B. Farmer and R. G. Gordon, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1862474 8, G89 (2005). Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. A. Javey, J. Guo, Q. Wang, M. Lundstrom, and H. Dai, Nature (London) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01797 424, 654 (2003). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  15. 15. V. V. Zhirnov, C. Lizzul-Rinne, G. J. Wojak, R. C. Sanwald, and J. J. Hren, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1342006 19, 87 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  16. 16. D. McClain, R. Solanki, L. F. Dong, and J. Jiao, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B https://doi.org/10.1116/1.2137338 24, 20 (2006). Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. C. J. Lee, T. J. Lee, S. C. Lyu, Y. Zhang, H. Ruh and H. J. Lee, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1518810 81, 3648 (2002). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  18. 18. M. Sveningsson, R. E. Morjan, O. A. Nerushev, E. B. Campbell, D. Malsch, and J. A. Schaefer, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1819521 85, 4487 (2004). Google ScholarScitation
  19. 19. J. F. Conley, Jr., J. Green, L. Dong, J. Jiao, and Y. Ono (unpublished). Google Scholar
  1. © 2006 American Institute of Physics.