No Access Submitted: 02 December 2004 Accepted: 28 February 2005 Published Online: 30 March 2005
Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 143111 (2005); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1897435
more...View Affiliations
View Contributors
  • James Hedberg
  • Lifeng Dong
  • Jun Jiao
Herein we present a method to disperse and align carbon nanotubes on various substrate surfaces. Using the shear forces associated with a rapidly moving fluid, nanoscale objects were positioned in a direction corresponding to the flow vector of the fluid. Dispersion of carbon nanotubes on microaddressable electrodes via the gas flow method creates opportunities for scaling up the production of nanoscale devices. In this letter, we demonstrate the feasibility of the method and the electrical characterization results obtained after the fabrication of carbon nanotube testing structures.
The authors would like to acknowledge the Intel Corp. for support of this research, the gracious help of Dr. Raj Solanki and the use of his electronic testing facilities at the Oregon Graduate Institute, and Valery Dubin and Ramanan Chebiam for their stimulating conversations. The participation of the undergraduate student for this project is supported by the NSF under Award No. DMR-220926.
  1. 1. H. B. Peng, T. G. Ristroph, G. M. Schurmann, G. M. King, J. Yoon, V. Narayanamurti, and J. A. Golovchenko, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1627935 83, 4238 (2003). Google ScholarScitation
  2. 2. Z. Chen, W. Hu, J. Guo, and K. Saito, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B https://doi.org/10.1116/1.1689307 22, 776 (2004). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  3. 3. P. A. Williams, S. J. Papadakis, M. R. Falvo, A. M. Patel, M. Sinclair, A. Seeger, A. Helser, R. M. Taylor II, S. Washburn, and R. Superfine, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1467701 80, 2574 (2002). Google ScholarScitation
  4. 4. H. Xin and A. T. Woolley, Nano Lett. 4, 1481 (2004). Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. J. L. Bahr, E. T. Mickelson, M. J. Bronikowski, R. E. Smalley, and J. M. Tour, Chem. Commun. (Cambridge) https://doi.org/10.1039/b008042j 2, 193 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. S. Niyogi, M. A. Hamon, D. E. Perea, C. B. Kang, B. Zhao, K. S. Pal, A. E. Wyant, M. E. Itkis, R. C. Haddon, J. Phys. Chem. B https://doi.org/10.1021/jp034866d 107, 8799 (2003). Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. T. Brintlinger, Y.-F. Chen, T. Dürkop, E. Cobas, M. S. Fuhrer, J. D. Barry, and J. Melngailis, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1509113 81, 2454 (2002). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. J. Han, M. P. Anantram, R. L. Jaffe, J. Kong, and H. Dai, Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.14983 57, 14983 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. X. Q. Chen, T. Saito, H. Yamada, and K. Matsushige, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1377627 78, 3714 (2001). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. I. W. Chiang, B. E. Brinson, R. E. Smalley, J. L. Margrave, and R. H. Hauge, J. Phys. Chem. B https://doi.org/10.1021/jp003453z 105, 1157 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. S. Dag, O. Gülseren, S. Ciraci, and T. Yildirim, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1616662 83, 3180 (2003). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  12. 12. J.-O. Lee, C. Park, J.-J. Kim, J. Kim, J. W. Park, and K. H. Yoo, J. Phys. D https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/33/16/303 33, 1953 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. X. Cui, M. Freitag, R. Martel, L. Brus, and P. Avouris, Nano Lett. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl034193a 3, 783 (2003). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  1. © 2005 American Institute of Physics.