No Access
Published Online: 23 September 2004
Accepted: June 2004
Journal of Applied Physics 96, 3666 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1784617
Epitaxial lateral overgrown (ELOG) gallium nitride (GaN) on SiC is being studied as a possible substrate for blue laser diodes. A defect density below 2.2×107cm2 in the wings, compared to 2×109cm2 in the windows, was achieved. Interaction of the overgrown GaN with the SiO2 mask causes a few degree wing tilt and a transition region of high defect density between windows and wings. Diminished PL, strong tensile stress, and a defect correlated line at around 3.4eV emerge in this up to two-micron-wide transition region. By changing the mask material from SiO2 to SiN we were able to reduce the wing tilt drastically to below 0.7°. This eliminates the defective transition region and extends the low strain and the low defect density area of the ELOG wings. The methods used to study strain, wing tilt, and threading dislocations in the ELOG samples are microphotoluminescence (μPL), transmission electron microscopy, x–ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscope. We also demonstrate the use of the first momentum of the μPL spectra as an effective means to measure strain distribution.
The authors thank Frank Habel (University of Ulm, Germany) for performing the EPD measurements. This research was supported by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) Germany.
  1. 1. http://www.blu-ray.com (2002). Google Scholar
  2. 2. S. Dassonneville, A. Amokrane, B. Sieber, J.-L. Farvacque, B. Beaumont, and P. Gibart, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1349864 89, 3736 (2001). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  3. 3. A. Amokrane, et al., J. Phys.: Condens. Matter https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/12/49/328 12, 10271 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. S. Dassonneville, et al., Physica B 273274, 148 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. T. Sugahara, et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.37.L398 37, L398 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. S. J. Rosner, E. C. Carr, M. J. Ludowise, G. Girolami, and H. I. Erikson, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.118322 70, 420 (1997). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  7. 7. C. S. Tomiya, et al., Phys. Status Solidi A https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200111)188:1<69::AID-PSSA69>3.3.CO;2-# 188, 69 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. B. Beaumont, Ph. Vennegue’s, and P. Gibart, Phys. Status Solidi B https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3951(200109)227:1<1::AID-PSSB1>3.0.CO;2-Q 227, 1 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. K. Hiramatsu, et al., J. Cryst. Growth https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(00)00707-7 221, 316 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. K. Motoki, et al., J. Cryst. Growth https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(01)02078-4 237239, 912 (2002). Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. S. Nakamura, M. Senoh, S. Nagahama, N. Isawa, T. Matushita, and T. Mukai, MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 4S1, G1–1 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. S.-I. Nagahama et al., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 39, 647 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. S. N. Mohammad, A. A. Salvador, and H. Morcok, Proc. IEEE https://doi.org/10.1109/5.469300 83, 1306 (1995). Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. V. Härle, et al., Phys. Status Solidi A https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200007)180:1<5::AID-PSSA5>3.0.CO;2-I 180, 5 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. V. Kümmler, et al., Phys. Status Solidi A https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200212)194:2<419::AID-PSSA419>3.0.CO;2-B 194, 419 (2002). Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. T. S. Zheleva, et al., MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicond. Res. 4S1, G3–38 (1999). Google Scholar
  17. 17. U. T. Schwarz, P. J. Schuck, M. D. Mason, R. D. Grober, M. Roskowski, S. Einfeldt, and R. F. Davis, Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.045321 67, 045321 (2003). Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. A. M. Roskowski, et al., Phys. Status Solidi A https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-396X(200112)188:2<729::AID-PSSA729>3.3.CO;2-N 188, 729 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. A. Sakai, H. Sunakawa, and A. Usui, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.121907 73, 481 (1998). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  20. 20. P. Fini, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.126812 76, 3893 (2000). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  21. 21. B.-C. Chung and M. Gershenzon, J. Appl. Phys. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.351848 72, 651 (1992). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  22. 22. M. Benyoucef, M. Kuball, B. Beaumont, and P. Gibart, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1464664 80, 2275 (2002). Google ScholarScitation
  23. 23. Y. T. Rebane and Y. G. Shreter, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 155, 703 (1997). Google Scholar
  24. 24. S. Fischer, et al., J. Cryst. Growth 189–190, 556 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. C. Kiselowski, et al., Phys. Rev. B https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.54.17745 54, 17745 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. V. Dierolf, O. Svitelskiy, G. S. Cargill III, A. Yu. Nikiforov, J. Redwing, and J. Acord, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 798, Y5–64 (2003). Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. S. Tomiya et al., Proceedings of the International Workshop on Nitride Semiconductors, IPAP Semidconductor Series Vol. 1, p.284 (2000). Google Scholar
  28. 28. S. Tomiya, K. Funato, T. Asatsuma, T. Hino, S. Kijima, T. Asano, and M. Ikeda, Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.127069 77, 636 (2000). Google ScholarScitation
  29. 29. F. Habel and M. Seyboth, Phys. Status Solidi C 0, 2448 (2003). Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2004 American Institute of Physics.