No Access Submitted: 11 February 2004 Accepted: 05 April 2004 Published Online: 10 June 2004
Physics of Plasmas 11, 3572 (2004); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1758717
more...View Affiliations
  • Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California, P. O. Box 808, L-095, Livermore, California 94551
View Contributors
  • John D. Ramshaw
Thermodynamic state relations for mixtures of partially ionized nonideal gases are often approximated by artificially partitioning the mixture into compartments or subvolumes occupied by the pure partially ionized constituent gases, and requiring these subvolumes to be in temperature and pressure equilibrium. This intuitively reasonable procedure is easily shown to reproduce the correct thermal and caloric state equations for a mixture of neutral (nonionized) ideal gases. The purpose of this paper is to point out that (a) this procedure leads to incorrect state equations for a mixture of partially ionized ideal gases, whereas (b) the alternative procedure of requiring that the subvolumes all have the same temperature and free electron density reproduces the correct thermal and caloric state equations for such a mixture. These results readily generalize to the case of partially degenerate and/or relativistic electrons, to a common approximation used to represent pressure ionization effects, and to two-temperature plasmas. This suggests that equating the subvolume electron number densities or chemical potentials instead of pressures is likely to provide a more accurate approximation in nonideal plasma mixtures.
  1. 1. J. P. Cox and R. T. Giuli, Principles of Stellar Structure (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1968), Vol. 1. Google Scholar
  2. 2. P. P. Eggleton, J. Faulkner, and B. P. Flannery, Astron. Astrophys. 23, 325 (1973). Google Scholar
  3. 3. M. Mitchner and C. H. Kruger, Jr., Partially Ionized Gases (Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1973). Google Scholar
  4. 4. I. Prigogine, Bull. Cl. Sci., Acad. R. Belg. 26, 53 (1940). Google Scholar
  5. 5. A. V. Potapov, High Temp. 4, 48 (1966). Google Scholar
  6. 6. D. Kannappanand T. K. Bose, Phys. Fluids 20, 1668 (1977). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  7. 7. M. L. Mittaland G. P. Gowda, J. Appl. Phys. 59, 1042 (1986). Google ScholarScitation
  8. 8. A. Morroand M. Romeo, J. Plasma Phys. 39, 41 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. M. C. M. van de Sanden, P. P. J. M. Schram, A. G. Peeters, J. A. M. van der Mullen, and G. M. W. Kroesen, Phys. Rev. A 40, 5273 (1989). Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. V. Bakshi, Phys. Rev. A 42, 2460 (1990). Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. M. C. M. van de Sanden, P. P. J. M. Schram, J. A. M. van der Mullen, and D. C. Schram, Phys. Rev. A 42, 2461 (1990). Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. M. C. M. van de Sandenand P. P. J. M. Schram, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5150 (1991). Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. J. A. M. van der Mullen, D. A. Benoy, F. H. A. G. Fey, B. van der Sijde, and J. Vlček, Phys. Rev. E 50, 3925 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  14. 14. D. Giordano, Phys. Rev. E 58, 3098 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. D. Giordanoand M. Capitelli, Phys. Rev. E 65, 016401 (2001). Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2004 American Institute of Physics.