ABSTRACT
A recurrence plot is a visualization tool for analyzing experimental data. These plots often reveal correlations in the data that are not easily detected in the original time series. Existing recurrence plot analysis techniques, which are primarily application oriented and completely quantitative, require that the time-series data first be embedded in a high-dimensional space, where the embedding dimension is dictated by the dimension of the data set, with One such set of recurrence plot analysis tools, recurrence quantification analysis, is particularly useful in finding locations in the data where the underlying dynamics change. We have found that for certain low-dimensional systems the same results can be obtained with no embedding.
- 1. J.-P. Eckmann, S. Kamphorst, and D. Ruelle, “Recurrence plots of dynamical systems,” Europhys. Lett. 4, 973–977 (1987). Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. C. Webberand J. Zbilut, “Dynamical assessment of physiological systems and states using recurrence plot strategies,” J. Appl. Physiol. 76, 965–973 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. P. Kaluznyand R. Tarnecki, “Recurrence plots of neural spike trains,” Biol. Cybern. 68, 527–534 (1993). Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. L. Trulla, A. Giuliani, J. Zbilut, and C. Webber, “Recurrence quantification analysis of the logistic equation with transients,” Phys. Lett. A 223, 255–260 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. M. Casdagli, “Recurrence plots revisited,” Physica D 108, 12–44 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. T. Sauer, J. A. Yorke, and M. Casdagli, “Embedology,” J. Stat. Phys. 65, 579–616 (1991). Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. N. Packard, J. Crutchfield, J. Farmer, and R. Shaw, “Geometry from a time series,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 712 (1980). Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. F. Takens, “Detecting strange attractors in fluid turbulence,” in Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, edited by D. Rand and L.-S. Young (Springer, Berlin, 1981), pp. 366–381. Google Scholar
- 9. H. D. I. Abarbanel, Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data (Springer, New York, 1995). Google Scholar
- 10. A. M. Fraserand H. L. Swinney, “Independent coordinates for strange attractors from mutual information,” Phys. Rev. A 33(2), 1134–1140 (1986). Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. M. B. Kennel, R. Brown, and H. D. I. Abarbanel, “Determining minimum embedding dimension using a geometrical construction,” Phys. Rev. A 45, 3403–3411 (1992). Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. D. Kaplan and L. Glass, Understanding Nonlinear Dynamics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995). Google Scholar
- 13. C. E. Shannon, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 1964). Google Scholar
- 14. G. H. Gunaratne, P. S. Linsay, and M. J. Vinson, “Chaos beyond onset: A comparison of theory and experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1 (1989). Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. C. Sparrow, “The Lorenz equations,” in Synergetics: A Workshop, edited by H. Haken (Springer Verlag, New York, 1977), pp. 111–134. Google Scholar
- 16. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1994). Google Scholar
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.
