ABSTRACT
The wavelet transform, a family of orthonormal bases, is introduced as a technique for performing multiresolution analysis in statistical mechanics. The wavelet transform is a hierarchical technique designed to separate data sets into sets representing local averages and local differences. Although one-to-one transformations of data sets are possible, the advantage of the wavelet transform is as an approximation scheme for the efficient calculation of thermodynamic and ensemble properties. Even under the most drastic of approximations, the resulting errors in the values obtained for average absolute magnetization, free energy, and heat capacity are on the order of 10%, with a corresponding computational efficiency gain of two orders of magnitude for a system such as a Ising lattice. In addition, the errors in the results tend toward zero in the neighborhood of fixed points, as determined by renormalization group theory.
- 1. K. F. Freed, Renormalization Group Theory of Macromolecules (Wiley, New York, 1987). Google Scholar
- 2. R. F. Rapoldand W. L. Mattice, Macromolecules 29, 2457 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 3. J. Choand W. L. Mattice, Macromolecules 30, 637 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 4. P. Dorukerand W. L. Mattice, Macromolecules 30, 5520 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 5. P. Dorukerand W. L. Mattice, Macromol. Theory Simul. 8, 463 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 6. T. A. Arias, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 267 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. G. Beylkin, N. Coult, and M. J. Mohlenkamp, J. Comput. Phys. 152, 32 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. B. R. Johnson, J. P. Modisette, P. J. Nordlander, and J. L. Kinsey, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8309 (1999). Google ScholarScitation
- 9. M. R. Luettgen, W. C. Karl, A. S. Willsky, and R. R. Tenney, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 41, 3377 (1993). Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. M. R. Luettgen, “Image processing with multiscale stochastic models,” Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1993. Google Scholar
- 11. D.-W. Huang, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3961 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. L. G. Gamero, A. Plastino, and M. E. Torres, Physica A 246, 487 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. M. O’Carroll, J. Stat. Phys. 73, 945 (1993). Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. M. O’Carroll, J. Stat. Phys. 71, 415 (1993). Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. G. Battle, Wavelets and Renormalization (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999). Google Scholar
- 16. A. Haar, Math. Ann. 69, 331 (1910). Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. S. G. Mallat, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 674 (1989). Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. S. G. Mallat, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 315, 69 (1989). Google Scholar
- 19. I. Daubechies, Ten Lectures on Wavelets, Vol. 61 in CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1992). Google Scholar
- 20. A. Cohenand I. Daubechies, Revistas Matematicas Ibero-americana 9, 51 (1993). Google Scholar
- 21. W. Sweldensand R. Piessens, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Numer. Anal. 31, 1240 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. W. Sweldensand R. Piessens, Numer. Math. 68, 377 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
- 23. G. Strang and T. Nguyen, Wavelets and Filter Banks (Wellesley-Cambridge, Cambridge, 1996). Google Scholar
- 24. W. Sweldens and P. Schröder, in Wavelets in Computer Graphics, ACM SIGGRAPH Course notes, New Orleans (ACM, New York, 1996), pp. 15–87. Google Scholar
- 25. I. Daubechies, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 909 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. D. Gines, G. Beylkin, and J. Dunn, Applied Computational Harmonic Analysis 5, 156 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. G. H. Golub and C. F. Van Loan, Matrix Computations (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1996). Google Scholar
- 28. L. N. Trefethen and D. Bau III, Numerical Linear Algebra (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1997). Google Scholar
- 29. W. Sweldens, SIAM (Soc. Ind. Appl. Math.) J. Math. Anal. 29, 511 (1997). Google Scholar
- 30. I. Daubechiesand W. Sweldens, Journal of Fourier Analysis and Its Applications 4, 247 (1998). Google Scholar
- 31. R. K. Pathria, Statistical Mechanics (Butterworth–Heinemann, Woburn, 1996). Google Scholar
- 32. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944). Google ScholarCrossref
- 33. S. Istrail, “Statistical mechanics, three-dimensionality, and NP-completeness. I. Universality of intractability for the partition function of the Ising model across nonplanar surfaces,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Portland, Oregon (ACM, New York, 2000), pp. 87–96. Google Scholar
- 34. T. H. Cormen, C. E. Leiserson, and R. L. Rivest, Introduction to Algorithms (McGraw–Hill–MIT Press, Cambridge, 1990). Google Scholar
- 35. N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (Addison–Wesley, Reading, 1992). Google Scholar
- 36. C. Best, A. Schäfer, and W. Greiner, Nucl. Phys. B, Proc. Suppl. 34, 780 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
- 37. A. E. Ismail, G. Stephanopoulos, and G. C. Rutledge, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 4424 (2003) (following paper). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 38. H. E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Clarendon–Oxford, Oxford, 1971). Google Scholar
- 39. S.-K. Ma, Modern Theory of Critical Phenomena (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, 1976). Google Scholar
- 40. J. J. Binney, N. J. Dowrick, A. J. Fisher, and M. E. J. Newman, The Theory of Critical Phenomena: An Introduction to the Renormalization Group (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993). Google Scholar
- 41. A. A. Migdal, Sov. Phys. JETP 42, 413 (1976). Google Scholar
- 42. A. A. Migdal, Sov. Phys. JETP 42, 743 (1976). Google Scholar
- 43. K. J. Wilsonand J. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12, 75 (1974). Google ScholarCrossref
- 44. P.-G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, New York, 1979). Google Scholar
- 45. M. E. Fisher, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 653 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

