No Access Submitted: 31 October 2001 Accepted: 08 January 2002 Published Online: 23 April 2002
Physics of Plasmas 9, 2221 (2002); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1459451
more...View Affiliations
  • University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551
View Contributors
  • Peter Amendt
  • J. D. Colvin
  • R. E. Tipton
  • D. E. Hinkel
  • M. J. Edwards
  • O. L. Landen
  • J. D. Ramshaw
  • L. J. Suter
  • W. S. Varnum
  • R. G. Watt
Analysis and design of indirect-drive National Ignition Facility double-shell targets with hohlraum temperatures of 200 eV and 250 eV are presented. The analysis of these targets includes the assessment of two-dimensional radiation asymmetry and nonlinear mix. Two-dimensional integrated hohlraum simulations indicate that the x-ray illumination can be adjusted to provide adequate symmetry control in hohlraums specially designed to have high laser-coupling efficiency [Suter et al., Phys. Plasmas 7, 2092 (2000)]. These simulations also reveal the need to diagnose and control localized 10–15 keV x-ray emission from the high-Z hohlraum wall because of strong absorption by the high-Z inner shell. Preliminary estimates of the degree of laser backscatter from an assortment of laser–plasma interactions suggest comparatively benign hohlraum conditions. The application of a variety of nonlinear mix models and phenomenological tools, including buoyancy-drag models, multimode simulations and fall-line optimization, indicates a possibility of achieving ignition, i.e., fusion yields greater than 1 MJ. Planned experiments on the Omega laser will test current understanding of high-energy radiation flux asymmetry and mix-induced yield degradation in double-shell targets.
  1. 1. J. A. Paisner, J. D. Boyes, S. A. Kumpan, W. H. Lowdermilk, and M. S. Sorem, Laser Focus World 30, 75 (1994). Google Scholar
  2. 2. S. W. Haan, S. M. Pollaine, J. D. Lindlet al., Phys. Plasmas 2, 2480 (1995). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  3. 3. J. K. Hofferand L. R. Foreman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1310 (1988); Google ScholarCrossref
    J. Sanchezand W. H. Giedt, Fusion Technol. 36, 346 (1999). , Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. G. W. Collins, D. N. Bittner, E. Monsler, S. Letts, E. R. Mapoles, and T. P. Bernat, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 14, 2897 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. J. Sater, B. Kozioziemski, G. W. Collins, E. R. Mapoles, and J. Pipes, Fusion Technol. 36, 229 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. J. D. Lindl, Inertial Confinement Fusion (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998). Google Scholar
  7. 7. D. H. Munro, P. M. Celliers, G. W. Collins, D. M. Gold, L. B. DaSilva, S. W. Haan, R. C. Cauble, B. A. Hammel, and W. W. Hsing, Phys. Plasmas 8, 2245 (2001). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. S. M. Pollaine, D. K. Bradley, O. L. Landen, R. J. Wallace, O. S. Jones, P. A. Amendt, L. J. Suter, and R. E. Turner, Phys. Plasmas 8, 2357 (2001). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  9. 9. L. J. Suter, J. Rothenberg, D. Munro, B. Van Wonterghem, and S. Haan, Phys. Plasmas 7, 2092 (2000). Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. T. R. Boehly, D. R. Brown, R. S. Craxtonet al., Opt. Commun. 133, 495 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  11. 11. S. A. Colgate and A. G. Petschek, “Minimum conditions for the ignition of fusion,” LA-UR-88-1268, 1988; copies may be obtained from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161. Google Scholar
  12. 12. R. G. Watt, N. D. Delamater, P. L. Gobby, V. M. Gomez, J. E. Moore, G. D. Pollak, W. S. Varnum, and J. D. Colvin, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 44, 166 (1999). Google Scholar
  13. 13. W. S. Varnum, N. D. Delamater, S. C. Evanset al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5153 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. D. B. Harrisand W. S. Varnum, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 41, 1479 (1996). Google Scholar
  15. 15. G. B. Zimmermanand W. L. Kruer, Comments Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion 2, 51 (1975). Google Scholar
  16. 16. J. D. Ramshaw, Phys. Rev. E 58, 5834 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. G. Dimonteand M. Schneider, Phys. Rev. E 54, 3740 (1996); Google ScholarCrossref
    G. Dimonte, Phys. Plasmas 6, 2009 (1999). , Google ScholarScitation
  18. 18. P. Amendt, A. I. Shestakov, O. L. Landen, D. K. Bradley, S. M. Pollaine, L. J. Suter, and R. E. Turner, Phys. Plasmas 8, 2908 (2001). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  19. 19. L. V. Powers, R. L. Berger, R. L. Kauffmanet al., Phys. Plasmas 2, 2473 (1995). Google ScholarScitation
  20. 20. E. A. Williams (private communication, 2000). Google Scholar
  21. 21. R. E. Tipton, D. J. Steinberg, and Y. Tomita, Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. Int. J. Ser. II 35, 67 (1992). Google Scholar
  22. 22. D. L. Youngs, Physica D 12, 32 (1984). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  23. 23. C. G. Speziale, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 107 (1991). Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. J. D. Ramshaw, Phys. Rev. E 61, 5339 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2002 American Institute of Physics.